Terapias cuádruples son superiores a terapia triple estándar en primera línea de erradicación de Helicobacter pylori en Chile / Quadruple therapies are superior to standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori first-line eradication in Chile

Introducción: La infección por Helicobacter pylori afecta aproximadamente al 70% de la población chilena. Es un problema de salud pública cuyo tratamiento de erradicación forma parte de políticas públicas en Chile. Objetivos: Caracterizar los esquemas de erradicación de primera línea de H. pylori más utilizados en nuestro medio y evaluar su eficacia. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo donde, en pacientes con infección por H. pylori certificada, se evaluó el esquema de erradicación indicado por el médico tratante, su eficacia, adherencia y efectos adversos. Resultados: Se analizaron 242 pacientes y 4 esquemas de erradicación; terapia triple estándar, terapia dual, concomitante y cuadriterapia con bismuto. Se observaron tasas de erradicación de 81,9% (IC 95% 74,44-87,63), 88,5% (IC 95% 73,13-95,67), 93,7% (IC 95% 78,07-98,44) y 97,6% (IC 95% 84,81-99,67) respectivamente, siendo más eficaces la terapia concomitante (RR: 1,14; IC 95% 1,01-1,29; p=0,028) y cuadriterapia con bismuto (RR: 1,19; IC 95% 1,09-1,31; p<0,001) que la triple terapia estándar. La tasa de efectos adversos reportados fue de 58,5% (IC 95% 50,66-65,92), 35,4% (IC 95% 24,6-48,11), 22,9% (IC 95% 11,81-37,14) y 63,4% (IC 95% 47,8-76,64), para la terapia triple estándar, dual, concomitante, y cuádruple con bismuto, respectivamente. La terapia dual y concomitante tuvieron menos efectos adversos en comparación con la terapia estándar. Conclusiones: Las cuadriterapias son superiores a la triple terapia estándar por lo que deberían ser consideradas como tratamiento de primera línea en Chile. La terapia dual es promisoria. Más estudios serán requeridos para determinar qué esquemas son más costo-efectivos.(AU)

Introduction: Helicobacter pylori infection affects approximately 70% of the Chilean population. It is a public health problem whose eradication treatment is part of the explicit health guarantees in Chile. Objectives: Characterize the most widely used H. pylori first-line eradication therapies in our environment and evaluate their efficacy. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out where, in patients with certified H. pylori infection, the eradication therapy indicated by the treating physician, its efficacy, adherence and adverse effects, in addition to the eradication certification method used, were evaluated. Results: 242 patients and 4 main therapies were analyzed: standard triple therapy, dual therapy, concomitant therapy, and bismuth quadruple therapy. Eradication rates of 81.9% (95% CI 74.44–87.63), 88.5% (95% CI 73.13–95.67), 93.7% (95% CI 78.07–98.44) and 97.6% (95% CI 84.81–99.67) were observed respectively, with concomitant therapy (RR: 1.14; 95% CI 1.01–1.29; p=.028) and quadruple therapy with bismuth (RR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.09–1.31; p<.001) being significantly more effective than standard triple therapy. Regarding the rate of reported adverse effects, it was 58.5% (95% CI 50.66–65.92), 35.4% (95% CI 24.6–48.11), 22.9% (95% CI 81–37.14) and 63.4% (95% CI 47.8–76.64), having the dual and concomitant therapy significantly fewer adverse effects compared with standard therapy. Conclusions: Quadruple therapies are superior to standard triple therapy and should be considered as first-line treatment in Chile. Dual therapy is promising. More studies will be required to determine which therapies are most cost-effective.(AU)

Reduced Immune Response to Inactivated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine in a Cohort of Immunocompromised Patients in Chile.

BACKGROUND: Inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines have been widely implemented in low- and middle-income countries. However, immunogenicity in immunocompromised patients has not been established. Herein, we aimed to evaluate immune response to CoronaVac vaccine in these patients. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 193 participants with 5 different immunocompromising conditions and 67 controls, receiving 2 doses of CoronaVac 8-12 weeks before enrollment. The study was conducted between May and August 2021, at Red de Salud UC-CHRISTUS, Santiago, Chile. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) positivity, total anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibody (TAb) concentrations, and T-cell responses were determined. RESULTS: NAb positivity and median neutralizing activity were 83.1% and 51.2% for the control group versus 20.6% and 5.7% (both P < .001) in the solid organ transplant group, 41.5% and 19.2% (both P < .0001) in the autoimmune rheumatic diseases group, 43.3% (P < .001) and 21.4% (P<.01 or P = .001) in the cancer with solid tumors group, 45.5% and 28.7% (both P < .001) in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection group, 64.3% and 56.6% (both differences not significant) in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant group, respectively. TAb seropositivity was also lower for the solid organ transplant (20.6%; P < .0001), rheumatic diseases (61%; P < .001), and HIV groups (70.9%; P = .003), compared with the control group (92.3%). On the other hand, the number of interferon γ spot-forming T cells specific for SARS-CoV-2 tended to be lower in all immunocompromising conditions but did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse immunocompromising conditions markedly reduce the humoral response to CoronaVac vaccine. These findings suggest that a boosting vaccination strategy should be considered in these vulnerable patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04888793.

High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 detection and prolonged viral shedding in stools: A systematic review and cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To: 1. Describe the frequency of viral RNA detection in stools in a cohort of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, and 2. Perform a systematic review to assess the clearance time in stools of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in two centers between March and May 2020. We included SARS-CoV-2 infected patients of any age and severity. We collected seriated nasopharyngeal swabs and stool samples to detect SARS-CoV-2. After, we performed a systematic review of the prevalence and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 in stools (PROSPERO-ID: CRD42020192490). We estimated prevalence using a random-effects model. We assessed clearance time by using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: We included 32 patients; mean age was 43.7±17.7 years, 43.8% were female, and 40.6% reported gastrointestinal symptoms. Twenty-five percent (8/32) of patients had detectable viral RNA in stools. The median clearance time in stools of the cohort was 11[10-15] days. Systematic review included 30 studies (1392 patients) with stool samples. Six studies were performed in children and 55% were male. The pooled prevalence of viral detection in stools was 34.6% (twenty-four studies, 1393 patients; 95%CI:25.4-45.1); heterogeneity was high (I2:91.2%, Q:208.6; p≤0.001). A meta-regression demonstrates an association between female-gender and lower presence in stools (p=0.004). The median clearance time in stools was 22 days (nineteen studies, 140 patients; 95%CI:19-25). After 34 days, 19.9% (95%CI:11.3-29.7) of patients have a persistent detection in stools. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in stools is a frequent finding. The clearance of SARS-CoV-2 in stools is prolonged and it takes longer than nasopharyngeal secretions.

Quadruple therapies are superior to standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori first-line eradication in Chile. / Terapias cuádruples son superiores a terapia triple estándar en primera línea de erradicación de Helicobacter pylori en Chile.

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori infection affects approximately 70% of the Chilean population. It is a public health problem whose eradication treatment is part of the explicit health guarantees in Chile. OBJECTIVES: Characterize the most widely used H. pylori first-line eradication therapies in our environment and evaluate their efficacy. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out where, in patients with certified H. pylori infection, the eradication therapy indicated by the treating physician, its efficacy, adherence and adverse effects, in addition to the eradication certification method used, were evaluated. RESULTS: 242 patients and 4 main therapies were analyzed: standard triple therapy, dual therapy, concomitant therapy, and bismuth quadruple therapy. Eradication rates of 81.9% (95% CI 74.44-87.63), 88.5% (95% CI 73.13-95.67), 93.7% (95% CI 78.07-98.44) and 97.6% (95% CI 84.81-99.67) were observed respectively, with concomitant therapy (RR: 1.14; 95% CI 1.01-1.29; p=.028) and quadruple therapy with bismuth (RR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.31; p<.001) being significantly more effective than standard triple therapy. Regarding the rate of reported adverse effects, it was 58.5% (95% CI 50.66-65.92), 35.4% (95% CI 24.6-48.11), 22.9% (95% CI 81-37.14) and 63.4% (95% CI 47.8-76.64), having the dual and concomitant therapy significantly fewer adverse effects compared with standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapies are superior to standard triple therapy and should be considered as first-line treatment in Chile. Dual therapy is promising. More studies will be required to determine which therapies are most cost-effective.